Wednesday, December 14, 2016

An Erotic Analysis of Broad City











As the millennial generation becomes increasingly diverse and liberally-minded, and the culture of binge-watching entertainment on streaming sites such as Netflix and Hulu becomes more commonplace, there is continuously a high demand for witty, funny, progressive content that is easily consumed and understood.  Comedy Central has been able to deliver this type of content since the ‘90s with media texts such as The Daily Show and South Park – challenging or poking-fun at the status-quos of society, essentially uncensored. One of their newest shows, Broad City, is proving to be the most progressive project yet.  The stoner drama is about two best friends in their mid-twenties, Abbi Abrams and Ilana Wexler, living in NYC and trying to find their paths post-college. They are not necessarily looking for love or romantic relationships, nor are they hell-bent on achieving professional careers, but they are living in the present, seeking to satisfy their social and sexual desires while remaining in-tune to current events and social constructs such as rape culture, sexism, and racism. In this essay, I use erotic analysis to argue that Broad City is a carnivalesque text that uses tropes of abjection and ambivalence.  Through the evaluation of the episode “Co-Op” (season 3, episode 2), I will show how viewers interpret these tropes as means to access and satisfy pleasures.

According to TV critic for The New Yorker Emily Nussbaum, Broad City started out in 2009 as a series of web video sketches. In 2014, the sketches became the “stoner drama” the show is now, spearheaded by co-creators Abbi Jacobson and Ilana Glazer (who also star as the show’s main characters, Abbi Abrams and Ilana Wexler) and produced by Amy Poehler. Since then, there have been three full seasons with ten episodes each and season four is to debut in summer 2017. From the start of the show up until the episode that I am analyzing in this essay, Ilana works (hardly) at an Internet start-up company called Deals Deals Deals. Abbi works at a health and fitness club called Soulstice where she started out as a “cleaner” but ultimately is promoted to be a trainer. Ilana is an eccentric, pot-smoking, hyper-sexual being who views her sexuality and gender on a spectrum and identifies as bisexual. She has romantic feelings for Abbi, but Abbi is straight. Abbi is ultra-competitive, idolizes Oprah (she has a tramp stamp to prove it), and can be a bit of a romantic as she is always swooning over her neighbor and as Nussbaum puts it, anyone with a man-bun.

Broad City bodes itself well to erotic analysis because it is so raw and progressive. It embraces the idea of intersectional feminism in which women own their sexualities to the fullest and aim to correct systemic oppressions beyond sexist issues. The episode analyzed in this essay, “Co-Op,” encapsulates the show's themes regarding sexuality and femininity as Abbi and Ilana switch places so that Ilana can keep her membership to the local organic food co-op, but not miss her doctor’s appointment in Long Island. While Abbi is acting as Ilana, she’s infatuated with a hippie-white-guy named Craig who also works at the co-op, and Ilana finds out on her way home from the doctor that Lincoln (her longtime friend-with-benefits) had sex with another woman.

Erotic analysis, according to Critical Media Studies authors Brian L. Ott and Robert L. Mack, is concerned with audience activity and how it is best understood through pleasure(s) (286). In defining pleasure, Ott and Mack quote media critic Ien Ang:

“Both in common sense and in more theoretical ways of thinking, entertainment is usually associated with simple, uncomplicated pleasure –hence the phrase, for example, ‘mere entertainment’. This is to evade the obligation to investigate which mechanisms lie at the basis of that pleasure, how that pleasure is produced and how it works – as though pleasure were something natural and automatic. Nothing is less true, however. Any form of pleasure is constructed and functions in a specific social and historical context” (286).

In other words, there is a multitude of different types of pleasure, thus pleasure is complex and does not always serve dominant or hegemonic interests. Furthermore, media erotics says there are two kinds of texts that might elicit erotic pleasures: writerly and carnivalesque. A writerly text is “a text whose meaning is relatively unfinished and unsettled and, thus, invites the audience to co-create its meaning” (Ott & Mac 381). A carnivalesque text, on the other hand, “embraces and embodies the spirit of medieval carnival” (Ott & Mac 375).  Ott and Mac write that the “carnival” was about (temporarily) celebrating liberation from the hierarchal forces of society (286). Gulnara Karimova writes in her article “Interpretive Methodology from Literary Criticism: Carnivalesque Analysis of Popular Culture: Jackass, South Park, and 'Everyday' Culture” that the carnivalesque is simply day-to-day life itself (37).

Under the umbrella of carnivalesque texts there is the central idea of grotesque realism, which is when a person or society values what is usually deemed as lowly, material and devalues what is “high, spiritual, ideal, abstract” (292). Within grotesque realism, Critical Media Studies lists the grotesque body, abjection, uncrowning, and ambivalence as its main tropes (292-293).

Grotesque realism is at work in the central premise of Broad City because Abbi and Ilana are always smoking marijuana, getting into trouble/pulling silly stunts, and simply just trying to make ends meet. In the pilot episode of Broad City Abbi and Ilana are running around all over NYC trying to make some money to attend a secret Lil Wayne concert. In their ultimate failure to do so, Ilana tries to cash in office supplies from her work and disappointingly only gets store credit in return, the girls play buckets like drums in Central Park in hopes of collecting tips, and they even clean a random man’s apartment in their underwear.  Neither of the girls are destitute or homeless, but neither of them live lavishly nor have a lot of money saved up.  They value experiences and friendship above social status and professional success.  The two also value their sex lives more than they do the idea of a committed relationship.

Abjection in Broad City

A modern example of abjection would be videos that show huge cysts being drained of puss or bloody surgeries – they are disgusting, but they get thousands and millions of views because we cannot look away.  Ott and Mack describe abjection to be what fascinates and disgusts (293). The Critical Media Studies authors quote Julia Kristeva as defining abjection as “what disturbs identity, system, order. What does not respect borders, positions, rules.” The abject is a trope that is prevalent in comedy such as South Park.  In the article “South Park, Blue Men, Anality, and Market Masculinity” by Judith Gardiner, she discusses the anus and anything anal mentioned in South Park as examples of abjection. One of the funniest episodes, according to the male audience in which Gardiner writes about, is an early episode in which the characters in South Park are farting and laughing the entire time (259). Anal references in comedy such as South Park are sometimes silly and trivial, such as jokes about farting, but other times speak to homosexuality and different religious views on homosexuality.

In the “Co-Op episode of Broad City, there are three primary instances as the anus being the abject. In the opening scene of this episode, Abbi and Ilana are walking down the street discussing anuses. Ilana tells Abbi confidently that she would most definitely be able to identify her butthole in a line of buttholes. Ilana says that everyone’s is different – “each one has a soul – an ass-soul.” Within the social construct of American society, it is not socially normal to discusses anuses openly. This instance of the anus as abject speaks to the comfortability Ilana has with her body and her sexuality as well as the comfortability between Abbi and Ilana to literally be able to talk about anything – no matter how taboo. This scene disturbs societal order because typically, it is not lady-like for women to speak in such explicit ways. There is also a bit of a shock factor by making this conversation the first dialogue of the episode without any scaffolding whatsoever, Ilana says “Oh, I guarantee I could identify my butthole in a lineup. One hundred percent.”

In this same scene, Abbi and Ilana’s conversation about anuses is interrupted by some young boys playing basketball. Competitive Abbi challenges them to a game of basketball, saying, “The only way you’re going to get to touch these boobs is if they graze the top of your head as I’m slam-dunking your skinny ass!” During the game, Abbi smacks Ilana’s butt in a congratulatory, sports-like manner. In return, Ilana basically pokes Abbi’s butthole. Abbi shakes her head “no” at Ilana in disproval. Ilana’s gesture is another example of the anus as abject because even though the two are comfortable with each other, Ilana crosses Abbi’s physical boundary by touching her in an unsolicited manner. This is not the first time in the series that Ilana has crossed this boundary. This scene is funny because anyone who watches Broad City knows that it is sort of an ongoing joke in the series that Ilana is sexually attracted to Abbi even though Abbi is straight. Even though Ilana’s inappropriate touching is abjection bringing light to the importance of respecting physical boundaries, the conversation about anuses hysterically helps to promote sex-positivity among women and comfortability with one’s body and sexuality.

The third example of the anus as abject happens just before Ilana asks Abbi to work as her in the co-op that day in order to keep her membership. Ilana has been cooking for Abbi with the food they get from the co-op, and Abbi says that all of the healthy produce has been giving her “the healthiest shits” of her life. Abbi then sings a little rendition of Beyonce’s “Flawless” and says about her bathroom experiences: “Dump out – flawless. Dump out – flawless.” In this instance, Abbi is talking about defecating, something that is primarily viewed as disgusting, hilariously, casually, and positively. Ott and Mac write in Critical Media Studies “that which is discharged or expelled from the body (i.e. menstrual blood, spittle, sweat, urine, feces, mucus) evokes disgust and revolt” (293). This scene is comedic because Abbi is juxtaposing Beyoncé – a pop culture, feminist icon to the two women as well as the millennial viewing audience – and “dump(ing).”  This very juxtaposition is a prime example of how carnivalesque texts elevate was is lowly (defecating) and downplay what is high-culture (Beyoncé).
           
Image result for broad city dump out flawless


Ambivalence in Broad City

Ott and Mac write that within carnivalesque texts, new ways of thinking and existing in the world are generated because of conversations dealing with the nuances between “contradictory feelings and impulses like fear and elation, seriousness and humor, praise and abuse…and certainty and uncertainty” (293-4). Ambivalence is essentially how social change is created or promoted through comedy. Paul Martin’s article “’The Man for His Time’ The Big Lebowski as Carnivalesque Social Critique,” analyzes how the film The Big Lebowski challenges hegemonic social hierarchies and social order in general (300).  Martin writes that comedic texts should never be overlooked or dismissed as trivial because they have the capabilities to communicate grotesque imagery and hierarchal inversion (310). Broad City, like The Big Lebowski, challenges hegemony and social norms in extremely progressive ways, particularly in regards to sexuality and correcting rape culture.

Ilana’s sexuality and relationship with Lincoln are ambivalent in “Co-Op” because even though she claims to be knowledgeable about rape culture – its language and its implications – she often (ironically) perpetuates it herself through her actions with Lincoln and her overall openness to speak and act sexually. When Lincoln is driving her to the doctor, she gets in his lap and says that she needs to be swaddled. When Lincoln tells her to get off, it’s not safe for her to be sitting on his lap while he’s trying to drive, she suggests they switch places so he can give her “road head.” Since this is an act that typically implies the man to be driving and receiving oral sex, Lincoln asks how that’s even possible. Ilana says “OK, road hand. Whatever. Just quit the pillow talk and get me off.” From a feminist analysis, this is an example of role-reversal. It is funny that Ilana is acting in such a way, but when men are demanding and forceful in seeking sexual pleasures, we call it rape culture. The viewer sees how out-of-the-ordinary this interaction between Lincoln and Ilana is and thus the interaction is ambivalent because of how the binary of male as dominant, female as submissive, is disrupted/flipped.  

Abbi, channeling her inner Ilana at the co-op.

Abbi’s impersonation of Ilana while working at the co-op is another example of ambivalence at work in this episode. Ilana is always hyper-sexual, which the viewer sees in the beginning of the episode when she is shopping for fruits and vegetables and fondles, caresses, and licks a tomato, a cucumber, and an orange, as if they were sexual body parts. However, when Abbi is acting as Ilana in the co-op, she is so sexual that it becomes rude in a few different instances. Abbi (pretending to be Ilana), blasts into the co-op announcing herself and that “rape culture sucks!” after that, she touches her breasts and simply just acts ridiculously while everyone is looking at her. Later on, she addresses a manager at the co-op by her wrong name, twice, and pretends to masturbate an eggplant in the manager’s direction, making her extremely uncomfortable. Craig, the co-op worker Abbi has a crush on, even tells her to “respect the produce.” This is an example of ambivalence because it shows that while owning your sexuality is a positive, healthy practice, there is a time and place for everything.  Ilana is supposed to be a champion for equality and sexual liberation, however, her efforts fail when her actions are disrespectful to others. Abbi’s over-dramatic acting efforts to be Ilana heighten this ambivalence, but, it is still true that Ilana’s sexual expressions often run contrary to what she truly believes.  

Ilana’s personality – her bisexuality and her loudness – makes her grotesque and contributes to her carnivalesque character and its ambivalent effect in the show. In the article “The ‘Grotesque’ Pussy: ‘Transformational Shame’ in Margaret Cho’s Stand-up Performances,” author Susan Pelle writes about how Margaret Cho’s stand-up comedy is ambivalent in that it promotes an intersectional approach to sexuality and gender by her being so explicit and over-the-top (21). Ilana is a lot like Cho in this way. Even though oftentimes Ilana’s actions and words are often problematic in attacking hegemony, they still always point out hegemony and spark discussion. The reaction a viewer of Broad City might have to Ilana’s craziness could be: I can’t believe she did! Or I can’t believe she said that! But that shock and initial shaking-of-the-head often turns into reflection and change. Some of the ways that Ilana acts are unacceptable. So, why is it acceptable when men act in those ways?

A final scene that depicts ambivalence in “Co-Op” is when Lincoln tells Ilana he hooked up with another woman. Even though Ilana does not want a committed relationship with Lincoln, and sleeps with other people herself, her initial reaction to this news is a dramatized (hilarious) version of how a woman might react if her partner told her he/she was cheating on her, according to social norms of women being more sensitive and loyal than men. Ilana angrily gets out of the car, yells, rips plants out of the ground, attempts to climb a tree, then jumps up and down on the hood of Lincoln’s car. Once she is done having this fit, she has a complete 360 perspective on the situation and thanks Lincoln for telling her about it. She then talks about how they are “open sex friends” and also a “modern-day Will and Jada.” Ilana then tells Lincoln, “Maybe we can trick her into having a threesome with us.” Lincoln responds right away that no one should ever trick anyone into having sex with them. Ilana agrees, realizes that she already knew this, she just had to hear it from him (a man) for it to hit home. She then has to leave, and gives Lincoln a “penis kiss” on her way out. This is another example of Ilana’s problematic language/actions becoming ambivalent to addressing rape culture and patriarchy in an ironic, comedic way.




When Ilana switches from raging out of anger about Lincoln’s news about hooking up with someone else to her much happier self, being excited about their newfound “openness” to their relationship, she says that they are bi. Lincoln says he is not, almost defensively, then quickly adds to his statement, “Yeah… I know… How do I really know if I never have tested my boundaries?” By making this statement, Lincoln is being supportive of Ilana’s beliefs in sexuality being a spectrum and not a strict binary. Then, at the end of the episode, Ilana is talking to Abbi about how happy she is that Lincoln slept with someone else. She even recites the details of their sexual encounter, telling Abbi how Lincoln was a sweetheart for giving the woman water to take her cranberry pills because she is prone to UTIs. Abbi is a bit shocked that Ilana is so happy and excited about Lincoln, and asks her if she’s sure she’s not jealous. Ilana says, “You know, if you love something, you have to let it have sex with other people. And if it comes back to you… Dope. Because then you also get to have sex with other people.”  Ilana’s comfortability with polygamy and is in direct opposition of the hegemony of traditional relationships in which the ultimate end goal is marriage. Ilana’s attitudes are ambivalent in that they promote a sex positive culture in which sexual partners are open and honest with one another. By being happy for Lincoln and appreciative of his honesty, she is asserting her own sexual independence.

Typically, in most media texts, bisexuality is never this explicit or accepted. In the article “Bisexuality in the Media: A Digital Roundtable,” media scholar Amy Andre criticized popular media for remaining implicit about bisexuality, discussing Friends and Seinfeld respectively: “Overall, I think that these TV shows represent bisexuality and bi-eroticism as implications in people’s lives, and without exposition… Rare is the character who utters the words, ‘I’m bisexual,’ however regularly the plotlines include characters who have attractions and interactions with partners of more than one gender” (Alexander). Ilana’s sexuality in Broad City is extremely explicit. Since monogamy among cis-gendered, straight people is often the default narrative of sexual relationships, Ilana and Lincoln’s support of Ilana’s beliefs, makes Broad City a progressive, ambivalent show that challenges traditional hegemony in society. 

Through the tropes of abjection and ambivalence within the carnivalesque theory of text, it is evident that fans of Broad City are interpreting these messages that challenge society's status quos, whether that be about relationships, sexuality, rape culture, and simply how a woman should speak and behave. 

Creative Component
A way in which Broad City could be a lot better for being truly progressive and initiating social  change would be to allow Ilana's character to be more reflexive about her words and actions regarding her sexuality. Yes, sometimes Lincoln or Abbi will correct her by telling her "hey, you shouldn't trick anyone into having sex" or to not touch someone who does not want to be touched, but not all of her behavior is acknowledged as problematic. 

Monday, December 5, 2016

A Feminist Approach to Broad City: How Abbi and Ilana’s Friendship Challenges the Patriarchy

           While there are several female comedians achieving high success right now in the entertainment industry (Chelsea Handler, Samantha Bee, Amy Schumer, etc.), men still dominate this field. Thanks to an increasingly diverse world, and the desirable millennial audience, comedy is starting to diversify and challenge the white, male, heteronormativity that has (and still does) encapsulate most media. One comedic media text that does this explicitly is Comedy Central’s progressively feminist show Broad City. The two main characters – Ilana Wexler (Ilana Glazer) and Abbi Abrams (Abbi Jacobson) – are also the show’s co-creators. Ilana and Abbi’s friendship is the driving narrative of the show. Each episode in the series opens and closes with the two together. There are moments where the female friendship starts to lean toward a possible homosexual relationship between the two, but for the most part, their friendship always takes precedence. An episode that truly shows how Ilana and Abbi’s friendship and humorous personalities challenge white male heteronormativity, and speak to the progressive feminist agenda of the show, is the episode “Co-Op” (season 3, episode 2).

Image result

   In “Co-Op,” Ilana signed up to work at a co-op organic grocery store. As she is shopping for produce (and making sexual innuendos with the fruits and veggies, see GIF above) she is denied a tab by the cashier because she hadn’t worked any of her co-op hours yet. It was the last day of that “moon cycle” that she could work the minimum of six hours to get her food, but she had a Dr.’s appointment on Long Island that she couldn’t miss. Like any best friends would do in this situation, Ilana and Abbi humorously switch places and Abbi attempts to work Ilana’s hours for her, “as” her. Wearing her eccentric clothes and playing up Ilana’s hyper-sexuality and activism, Abbi (“Ilana”) busts through the co-op doors to work her shift declaring “rape culture sucks!” Although not ethically the right thing to do (which is pointed out in the end of the episode when the store manager bans the two from the co-op forever), Abbi unquestionably puts on her best interpretation of Ilana. 

            The language Ilana and Abbi use, in this episode and throughout the entire series, speaks to the bond of their friendship as well as both of their commitments to defy gender and sexuality binaries. In the opening of “Co-Op,” Ilana and Abbi are walking down the street and openly and hilariously discussing anuses. The awkwardness that would normally ensue discussing a topic like this is nonexistent because the two are such good friends. Their conversation is cut off by some young boys playing basketball who stop to catcall the women, mentioning their breasts. Abbi tells the boys, “The only way you’re going to get to touch these boobs is if they graze the top of your head as I’m slam-dunking your skinny ass.” Ilana and Abbi challenge the young boys to a game of basketball. They are rather aggressive in physically beating them in the game and also in trash-talking afterward. During the game, Abbi smacks Ilana’s butt in celebration and Ilana in turn essentially pokes Abbi’s butthole. In response, Abbi shakes her head no at Ilana. After they win the game, Abbi makes a joke about “fucking the shit” out of one of the boys’ moms. She then smashes the basketball out of rage, making the boys cry (pictured below). 


This scene challenges a lot of real problems in society dealing with gender. By Abbi’s disapproving look in response to the way Ilana touched her, she’s showing that unsolicited touching – even among best friends – isn’t acceptable. Ironically, Abbi becomes immediately problematic by basically bullying the little boys in the way that men stereotypically bully other men. The facts that two grown women defeat a few young boys in a game of basketball, and the boys cry when the ball is literally smashed, are symbolic of how when women win or get ahead, even in the face of adversity (like being catcalled and objectified), men feel threatened. Physically smashing the ball becomes symbolic to smashing the patriarchy. Women standing up for themselves in the way that men stereotypically do (via harsh language and physical dominance), makes the boys cry, and the gut-reaction to their tears is for Ilana and Abbi to back down from their tough-talk to saying “no no no no no” and reaching out to console them.

            Another way that Ilana and Abbi challenge the patriarchy and heteronormativity is the language they use as well as how they address each other. In the article “Expanding the Brand: Race, Gender, and the Post-politics on Comedy Central” by Nick Marx, it is argued that the two address each other with masculine slang like “dude” but also “decry and deconstruct the sexual or professional shortcomings of male characters” (280). However, I think that the author fails to mention how other popular slang pronouns, such as “queen,” that are gendered feminine, are used interchangeably and just as frequently as words like “dude.” When Ilana is prepping Abbi to act as her in the co-op, they practice saying “yas queen,” “smell a dick,” and “nice pussy bitch.” Ilana is extremely sexual and views her sexuality, and all sexuality, on a spectrum as opposed to a binary. While she uses female-positive language like “yas queen,” she just as frequently uses expletives that don’t discriminate on gender and are just simply sexual. This behavior and language speaks to how feminism allows women to be as equally explicit and forward about sex as men are. 

            The “queen” pronoun that is favored by both Ilana and Abbi isn’t the only example of empowering female pop-culture being used in the comedy of the show. When Ilana asks Abbi to work as her in the co-op that day, they reveal in their conversation preceding that Ilana has been cooking food from the co-op that they are both eating. They both benefit from this co-op, so of course Abbi is going to help Ilana. This conversation further reveals the two’s comfortability with talking about any topic at all. Abbi says that ever since she’s been eating the meals Ilana cooks from the organic store, she says that she has been having the “healthiest shits of my life.” Abbi then mimics the Beyoncé song “Flawless” and says about her bathroom experiences: “Dump out, flawless. Dump out, flawless.” Even though they are being explicit and making jokes about bodily functions, something that is usually gendered male, they are still participating in stereotypically female-gendered behavior and language by referencing Beyoncé’s “Flawless” song.

           In conclusion, there are instances throughout the show where Abbi and Ilana might seem (on the surface) to be acting or speaking in ways that are gendered strictly male or female, however, this interchangeability just proves that they don’t view the world in strictly male or female perspectives. Roxanne Gay was the first to call herself a Bad Feminist in her collection of essays and I think it’s clear that Abbi and Ilana are not perfect feminists, but, that does not exist. Feminism allows women to live outside of that binary-perspective that favors white, male heteronormativity and Abbi and Ilana’s personalities and language show that they will be their authentic selves regardless of what may or may not be deemed as the “norm” in society. “Co-Op” is a useful example of how the show promotes a feminist message that women can be as sexual, tough, and explicit as men are without losing their femininity.


Works Cited

“Co-op.” Broad City, season 3, episode 2, Comedy Central, 24 February 2016. Hulu.

Marx, Nick. “Expanding the Brand: Race, Gender, and the Post-politics of Representation on Comedy Central.” Television & New Media, vol. 17, no. 3, 2016, pp. 272-287.

Ott, Brian L., and Robert L. Mack. Critical Media Studies: An Introduction. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Print.

Friday, October 14, 2016

Climate Change & the GOP: How Facts are Framed

Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for the 2016 Presidential election, has called climate change a hoax created by the Chinese. His running mate, Mike Pence, has recently been interviewed to clarify Trump’s thoughts on climate change and said that he believes climate change is happening naturally – due to natural, normal weather patterns – and not because of any man-made influences such as the emission of greenhouse gasses. Further, he believes that the threat of climate change is nothing more than a political agenda set forth by the Obama Administration and other Democrats. Most Republicans agree with the latter, and that’s what we see in the GOP’s official platform outline which was updated for the National Convention this past July.



Even though the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has said they have a 97 percent certainty on anthropogenic climate change, the American public’s views and opinions on climate change are extremely mixed. According to “Reframing the Climate Change Debate to Better Leverage Policy Change: An Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Psychology” by Terrance M. O’Sullivan, the American public’s confusion is due in part to widespread “political resistance to mitigation measures such as GHG reduction, government environmental regulations, and spending on research and alternative energy subsidies” (318). This resistance comes almost entirely from the GOP.

Source: NASA
In its platform, the GOP does not write off climate change entirely. Rather, it simply places it extremely low in the economic priority list of our nation. Part of its policy reads: “climate change is far from this nation’s most pressing national security issue” (GOP Platform 20). Even though research and statistical data proving climate change exist and are accessible, the GOP misleads its members and frames the science of climate change as a political agenda set forward by the Democratic Party. It frames scientific facts supported by a high percentage of scientists abroad and at home as untrustworthy.

According to Critical Media Studies by Brian L. Ott and Robert L. Mack, framing is a concept within Marxist analysis that is exercised by major media conglomerates and contributes to the undermining of democratic ideals (Ott 51). Framing is simply the lens used by the media or conglomerate by which the audience views the message(s). Typically used with news or entertainment media, I’m applying the concept of framing to the GOP’s platform to look at how scientific data is communicated (or left out) of conversations about climate change, thus resulting in the widespread confusion among US citizens.

Throughout the section “America’s Natural Resources: Agriculture, Energy, and the Environment” in the 2016 GOP Platform, scientific claims that aren’t even explicitly being described in the outline, are labeled as dishonest in a few different instances:

On trade: “We will not tolerate the use of bogus science and scare tactics to bar our products from foreign markets” (17).

On “radical environmentalists”: “Their approach is based on shoddy science, scare tactics, and centralized command-and-control regulation” (21).

On climate change in general: “Information concerning a changing climate, especially projections into the long-range future, must be based on dispassionate analysis of hard data” (22).

In these instances, scientific studies or results that are vaguely introduced are cast off as “shoddy” or “bogus” with zero explanation to how they are misleading or inaccurate. No scientists or scientific institutions (except for the UN’s IPCC) are mentioned. The GOP is framing environmental information in a way that encourages its members to distrust any science that supports climate change because it is all a part of the democratic agenda. Although 195 countries are members of the UN’s IPCC, the GOP claims that the scientists on its board are not reliable in its platform outline:

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a political mechanism, not an unbiased scientific institution. Its unreliability is reflected in its intolerance toward scientists and others who dissent from its orthodoxy (22).

It’s odd that the GOP is pointing out here that the IPCC is biased because it doesn’t tolerate scientists who dissent from their stances that climate change exists and the majority of its causes comes from human causes (O’Sullivan). If the IPCC was completely biased, wouldn’t there report claim 100 percent of scientists back climate change as opposed to the 95-97 percent numbers that are used?

The GOP not only frames scientific facts that would lead others away from their policy plans in a poorly-researched way, they frame the “facts” supporting their ideas ineffectually as well. Hardly any claims made in the platform regarding its own stances on the environment are not backed up with facts or data of any kind. Under the “A New Era in Energy” section the platform reads “the Democratic Party does not understand that coal is an abundant, clean, affordable, reliable domestic energy resource” but does not provide support for the claim that coal is clean (19).

Furthermore, under the “Environmental Progress” section, the GOP states that the environment is improving year by year, but provides zero statistical data that that is true (21).

From a Marxist Analysis view of framing, everything relates back to the means of production and where power and control exist in the economy. In the GOP’s platform, it’s obvious that they don’t think environmental efforts are worth tax dollars. They are vehemently against several initiatives that are supported by almost all other developed nations, primarily the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement that the US currently contributes money toward (22). The GOP wants to halt all US government spending to all UN supported initiatives regarding climate change, primarily the Green Climate Fund (22).

Republicans want a small government. They don’t believe in top-down mandates and they think that harsh environmental regulations on corporations will destroy our free-market economy. By framing the facts of climate change in a way that encourages Americans to distrust its government and the science they believe investing in, people are not recognizing the seriousness of environmental issues and will not until the problem affects them directly.


 Works cited:

“Democratic Party Platform 2016.” Dem Convention, July 2016. https://www.demconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Democratic-Party-Platform-7.21.16-no-lines.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2016.
Sullivan, Terrence M. and Roger Emmelhainz. “Reframing the Climate Change Debate to Better Leverage Policy Change: An Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Psychology.” Homeland Security & Emergency Management, vol. 11, no. 3, 2014, pp. 317-336
Ott, Brian L., and Robert L. Mack. Critical Media Studies: An Introduction. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Print.
Republican Platform 2016.” GOP, July 2016. https://prod-static-ngop-pbl.s3.amazonaws.com/static/home/data/platform.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2016.